As she and her husband wait for their train at Paddington Station, Stella locks eyes with a man and shares a flash of recognition although neither of them can quite work out why. Wind the clock back thirty years to 1977 and Stella is arriving at Paddington, eager to share the news of her pregnancy with John. Both are post-graduate students: he in quantum physics, she in literature. Given that it’s the ‘70s, Stella knows she’ll have to suspend her studies while John continues to make his name but she’s yet to grasp the grinding exhaustion and incipient resentment bringing up a toddler will provoke. Then John is struck down with a virus and the golden future they’d envisioned on their wedding day is no longer in prospect. Meanwhile, Charlie prepares for his sister’s wedding not far from where Stella and John were married, anxious about his alcoholic mother and the man his vulnerable sister is marrying. Their day will be devastated by a pub bombing. Beth returns from France, marrying Charlie against her well-heeled family’s wishes. These two will have a much-loved daughter, just like Stella and John, but Charlie’s work offers far too many opportunities for drink. Both couples face challenges that one will overcome and the other will not. Thirty years after Stella arrived in Paddington bursting with news, all four will be brought together by circumstance although they may not entirely recognize it.
Entanglement is about chance and the randomness of life, about love and the way we become caught up in our relationships with others. Stella, John, Beth and Charlie criss-cross each other’s paths over the thirty years Mahood’s debut spans leaving traces they may never entirely understand. By necessity, it’s a novel which entails suspending any disbelief in coincidences which abound throughout although none of them were implausible for me. Mahood smoothly shifts perspective from character to character but it’s Stella and Charlie that power this story forward from that opening shared moment at Paddington as we move inexorably towards the point where the two families become entangled. Engaging characters, empathetically developed, neatly brought together in an absorbing story which ends on a note of hope: I loved it, swallowing it in one greedy gulp. Already looking forward to Mahood’s next one.
Ooh, interesting – I read a much more negative review of this, so it’s good to know that you got something out of it.
A very fine comfort read for me at this dire time we find ourselves in.
I’m glad you were left feeling hopeful. So was I! I really enjoyed this novel of near misses and almost moments. I’m looking forward to what comes next, too.
I think this one’s perfect for losing yourself in, Kath. Much needed right now! I’m glad you enjoyed it, too.
I’ve enjoyed some novels structured in this way, the O’Farrell and the Nicholls that you mention. However, I really didn’t get on with ‘The Versions of Us’ mainly because I didn’t like the protagonists enough to care what happens to them in any of the timelines. I think I’ll suspend judgement on this and wait and see if the library buys a copy rather than spending hard earned cash on it.
That sounds like a wise plan to me. I thought the structure was handled well but I’m probably less critical with this kind of comfort fiction.
This sounds good and a hopeful note is what is needed right now! Dual narratives are so tricky to get right but when they work they’re so engaging, I always end up whizzing through them to find out the next thing the other narrator is going to say 🙂
They are aren’t they. Handled well, they’re one of my favourite structures, particularly when indulging in comfort reading.
I am hearing of the authir for the first time. Looks like the book really impressed you. 🙂
I enjoyed the storytelling aspect of it very much, Resh. It draws you in which is exactly what you want on the kind of long winter evenings we have here now.
Really good!
Glad you liked it.