Love and Fallout: Easy reading for Guardianistas

Love and FalloutA little while ago Kathryn Simmonds contacted me asking if I’d consider reviewing her novel. It’s published by Seren, a small publisher and I always have a soft spot for them, and it seemed interesting so I agreed to have a look at it. It was the Greenham Common theme that hooked me. I’ve never come across a novel set at the women-only peace camp whose aim was to prevent the storage of American cruise missiles on British soil. For several years it provided fodder for the tabloids who outdid themselves, and each other, in an ecstasy of outrage. Kathryn Simmonds’ novel alternates between the present and those strange months in 1982 when a group of disparate women came together and tried to save the world.

Tessa runs a tiny environmental charity. She spends her spare time caught up in all manner of right on causes seemingly on a one-woman campaign to save the planet with little time or attention left over for her husband, Pete. Best friend Maggie, with Pete’s connivance, has managed to get her on Make You Over, a reality TV programme which bears more than a passing resemblance to What Not to Wear – remember Trinny and Susannah? Tessa is appalled – I’d have murdered H if he’d sprung that one on me – but is persuaded that it would help publicise her many causes. She’s more than a little irked by Pete’s reaction to the newly made over her, high heels and all. Memories of Greenham are triggered when one of her campmates gets in touch and over the course of the novel we learn why Tessa has taken the world upon her shoulders.

Simmonds frames the central Greenham section of the book with alternating present day and 1980s narratives. There’s plenty of gentle humour – fun poked at the more outlandish sections of the Greenham women and a nice parallel drawn with the Feel Good festival at the end where well-heeled young people with a conscience enjoy guilt-free pleasures while helping to raise money. Simmonds slips in a few political points along the way without disturbing her smooth flowing narrative. No literary fireworks but it’s not that kind of book, more of an entertaining easy read with an absorbing story which manages to address a few issues without smacking you round the head with them.

This is the second novel I’ve looked at for an author – thankfully I enjoyed both. I’ve another waiting to be reviewed but I think that’s it for this blogger. It’s too nerve-wracking. If publishers send me books that either don’t appeal or I don’t enjoy, I feel no obligation to review them: that’s the deal. If an author sends me a book, it’s an entirely different kettle of fish: that’s personal.

6 thoughts on “Love and Fallout: Easy reading for Guardianistas

  1. Annecdotist

    Love how you’ve titled this post – so right about the Guardianistas and glad you enjoyed the book.
    I was in the same position with this novel, Susan. I was attracted by the Greenham element but a little unsure about the cover (which, as you know, really does fit the novel extremely well) looking potentially chicklit. So I was pleased when it met the standards for my debut novelists Q&A:
    http://annegoodwin.weebly.com/kathryn-simmonds.html

    Reply
  2. Claire 'Word by Word'

    It sounds like a promising debut and an interesting highlight on those events from the past, it would make a good film I am sure. Amazing how the font influences the cover, and how quickly we take these visual cues to categorise a book.

    It’s more difficult to be detached from the review when it is a personal request, but it’s also a good practice to remind us or challenge us to write a fair review with that consideration in mind, though I don’t like to have too many obligations like that, they become much less fun due tot he added expectation we put upon ourselves.

    I have a similar request coming up, made all the more intimidating because it comes from a debut author who is a retired and esteemed academic, one who has been conferred the ‘Chevalier dans l’Ordre des Palmes académiques’. I went to a lecture on Gide that he gave and after reading my recent review, he humbly asked if I would read his novel. I am looking forward to it with mixed emotion!

    Reply
    1. Susan Osborne Post author

      Oh, Claire, much sympathy with that although knowing your thoughtful balanced approach to reviewing I’m sure you’ll do his work justice.

      You’re quite right about jackets – I remember when raised gold lettering for a title meant ‘not for me’ but now I often see it on books that are to my taste.

      Reply

Leave a comment ...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.